Tech Spotlight

Technology For The Masses

&
 

Archive for March 13th, 2009

Mar 13 2009

Classic PenStyle E-Cig Review AKA RN4072, DSE801

Continuing on the electronic cigarette technology, I will be reviewing the Classic Penstyle E-Cig also known as a RN4072 and DSE801.  While their are different models, they are all basically the same size and work the same way, although their are some minute differences in atomizers and cartridges.  I have been been using the RN4072 solely for over a month now and my experiences are below.

ECig RN4072 DSE801 Penstyle

This Penstyle Ecig works very well.  The battery life is impressive operating anywhere between 6 to 8 hours with heavy use.  The cartridge is the best thing about this e-cig.  It holds almost a full one milliliter of juice which is the equivalent of approximately 10 to 12 regular tobacco cigarettes.  The atomizer performance is up to snuff, giving you a brilliant balance of vapor production with a pretty easy draw.

My previous review of the DSE901 or Mini E-Cig netted an overall rating of a 7, to see that review visit this link.  Now for the individual ratings of the Penstyle in a variety of categories.  Ease of draw (7), Looks (6), Weight (6), Vapor Production (8), Battery Life (8), Cartridge Life, Holds 1.0ml (9), Portability (5).  Overall, comparing all factors of the Penstyle, I would rate this as a perfect device for home use with a total rating scale of a 7.

The classic Penstyle electronic cigarette is great for heavy smokers who want the least amount of maintenance and changing of batteries.  The main downside to the RN4072 is the size and weight.  It is not highly portable and looks quite goofy to people who have no idea what the device is.  A great asset to the Penstyle models are that the parts are sold at many online shops and are readily available.  The Pens are without a doubt a favorite among E-Cig aficionados and I too like the device.

No responses yet

Some Today.com contributors may have received a fee or a promotional product or service from a manufacturer for promotional consideration, while others receive no consideration at all. Each contributor is responsible for disclosing any such promotional consideration.